Pratical Experience vs Theory - Why Outsource

Someone made a statement in a thread I was in that said "the problem with the best solutions, is that no matter how good we are when another culture can produce three engineers for less than one engineer from the US, the statistics and averages always support the higher number... It is nonsense for the US to believe anything else... Me(person making the statement) personally, I’ll always bet on the three heads... where they lack, is the field work... Little or No infrastructure within their own culture to practice turning theory in production;"

In a response, I followed with the following query, "If theory serves me correctly, practical experience leads to the creation of theories. An employer assumes that it is only practical experience that determines the quality of personal theories. However, understanding that practical experience is only part of the equation and together with personal theories is what is important in formulating formal theories. Without practical experience and personal theory, it would make the formulation of formal theories quite difficult to formulate.

My point is, how can 3 heads that has no form or lack of form (due to a lack of infrastructure within) to evaluate a circumstance that utilizes practical experience and personal theory that has proven to work to what has created formal theory (derived from practical experience + personal theory) be capable of turning formal theory in something they actually have no experience at physically doing? You can theorize all day long with 3 heads, would of, could of, should of theory, but without physically applying practical experience there would simply be no personal theory to lead to formal theory.

So by outsourcing based on simply believing “it works” scenario does not necessarily mean it is beneficial to the stability of a global economic windfall. Some of those beliefs are simply being followed by the adage of 3 heads are better than one, which one can honestly state is factual but only based on the theoretical viewpoint that practical experience and theory has created the strategy to succeed on this route, not merely basing it on personal theory only, which is what you’re are actually achieving with a partisan outcome derived at thought without physical experience.

I do not dispel statistical claims but trying to understand, book knowledge can run rapid but without practical experience, there would be no use for theory. So if another culture is simply applying theory where does it become more lucrative to outsource?"